Aspen Schuman vs Gaeul Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Schuman vs G. Jang

Aspen Schuman
USA
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
18
Age
19
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
739
0
Best Rank
730
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Gaeul Jang
KOR
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
18
Age
19
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
739
0
Best Rank
730
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Schuman 0 - 0 Jang
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schuman | 0 |
| Jang | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
A. Schuman vs G. Jang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.07% (37-19) | Career Total W/L | 49.44% (44-45) |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Schuman vs G. Jang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Aspen Schuman has won 35.37% of points on their second serve, while Gaeul Jang has won 37.40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Aspen Schuman, in recent form, has won 45.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gaeul Jang has won 45.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.89% and 36.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Aspen Schuman has saved 42.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaeul Jang has saved 45.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Aspen Schuman has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 12/6), with Gaeul Jang winning 54.72% (W/L 29/24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Aspen Schuman has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 35/18). Gaeul Jang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 44/43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Aspen Schuman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 8/3), where as Gaeul Jang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.00% of matches (W/L 18/12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Aspen Schuman has played against opponents with an average rank of 290.28 while Gaeul Jang has played against players with an average rank of 440.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Aspen Schuman has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaeul Jang has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Aspen Schuman has converted 41.30% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaeul Jang has converted 42.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Aspen Schuman vs Gaeul Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Schuman 50%, Jang 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Schuman 60%, Jang 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Schuman 56%, Jang 48%.
A. Schuman Recent Matches Played
G. Jang Recent Matches Played

A. Schuman vs G. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.07% (37/19) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.44% (44/45) |
| 62.70% (79/47) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (103/103) |
| 54.54% (619/516) | Games Win/Loss | 50.48% (952/934) |
| 66.04% (35/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.57% (44/43) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 36 | Aces Total | 144 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 134 | Total Double Faults | 263 |
| 1:31:48 | Average Match Time | 1:35:9 |
| 425.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.07 |
| 64% (2040/3211) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3232/5538) |
| 60% (1218/2040) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1956/3232) |
| 46% (544/1171) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (996/2306) |
| 52% (220/424) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (340/728) |
| 48% (1528/3169) | Return Points Win % | 46% (2628/5653) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 71.79% (28/11) | Futures W/L | 50.88% (29/28) |
| 66% (37/56) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (43/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 71% (5/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 64% (9/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 92% (37/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (43/35) |
| 8% (37/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (43/8) |
| 16% (19/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (46/8) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.83
W2
1.85
07:35 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.615
W2
2.16
09:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.03
W2
1.68
07:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.53
W2
2.31
08:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
2.76
W2
1.38
10:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.091
W2
5.85
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico